Cantabile
Tenant power · §42a, §42b, §42c EnWG

Your roof, your tenants, your neighbours

Solar power sold inside the building is worth far more than its feed-in tariff – and still cheaper for the tenants than their supplier. Cantabile prices it fairly, runs the building's battery and devices with it, and shows everyone what they gain.

Three models in plain words

Mieterstrom, GGV and Energy Sharing

German law offers three ways to share local solar power. Cantabile supports all three; per plant the operator chooses one.

Mieterstrom

§42a EnWG

The plant operator supplies the tenants completely: roof power plus the residual power it buys from the grid. The price is capped at 90 % of the local basic-supply tariff. The contract must be separate from the lease. A Mieterstrom premium is paid for solar power the tenants use directly.

GGV – shared building supply

§42b EnWG

Since May 2024 the lighter model: tenants get a share of the roof's power per quarter-hour and keep their own supplier for the rest. No price cap, no full-supply duty for the operator. Every participant needs quarter-hourly metering (a smart meter).

Energy Sharing

§42c EnWG

Sharing across the public grid with neighbours in the same grid area – since June 2026; with the adjacent grid area from June 2028. The shared kilowatt-hour pays the full grid fees and levies, so the margin lies in the energy part of the price.

Side by side

Mieterstrom (§42a)GGV (§42b)Energy Sharing (§42c)
Who takes partTenants of the building (or the same neighbourhood ensemble)Tenants of the buildingMembers across sites in the same grid area
What the price coversAll of the tenant's power, including residual powerOnly the allocated solar shareOnly the shared kWh – the energy part
The rest of the powerBought by the operatorThe tenant's own supplierThe member's own supplier
Price limitAt most 90 % of the basic-supply tariffNone by law; Cantabile keeps each tenant below their own tariffNone by law; never above the member's own supplier
Through the public gridNoNoYes: grid fees and levies apply

Swipe the table sideways to see all three models.

How Cantabile prices

Priced by competition, earned by dispatch

A tenant compares with what they would pay otherwise. So each tenant's price follows their own alternative – their supplier's price in that quarter-hour, or the basic-supply tariff – and stays below it.

The owner's gain comes from more roof power used in the building: each such kilowatt-hour earns close to a retail price instead of a feed-in rate of a few cents. The building's battery and the flats' own flexibility – reported by their boxes – move use into the sunny hours.

  • One optimisation sets the prices and the battery's schedule together, owner's gain first, then the tenants' savings.
  • Simple offers: two to four price bands per day, published a day ahead – or, in GGV, "X % below your own tariff in every quarter-hour".
  • Guarantees: the Mieterstrom cap per kilowatt-hour; never above the tenant's own tariff in any quarter-hour; an annual comparison on the bill.
  • The loop closes: the offer goes into the tenants' boxes as their tariff, so their heat pump, battery and car follow the sun.
Schematic: solar roof, flats, battery, grid connection and neighbours 12345
  1. 1Solar roof of the building
  2. 2Flats: tenant power at their own offer
  3. 3Building battery: charged only from the roof, discharged only into the flats
  4. 4Grid connection: residual supply and feed-in
  5. 5Neighbours across the public grid (§42c)
What the owner sees

The offer, the energy, the investment, the history

The offer

The bands per day, the average price, what the tenants save – and what goes into their boxes when it is sent.

Where the energy goes

Sold in the building, stored, fed in, curtailed, or short – per quarter-hour and in total, with the money each path earns or misses.

Invest or not

The same period with a bigger battery (+5, +10, +20 kWh) or more PV (+5, +10 kWp): extra sales, payback time and return – with your own quotes as costs.

History

Per day, month and year from the meters: generated, sold, fed in, the tenants' savings, the owner's money, planned against actual.

Privacy by design: the operator sees sums and the worst-off flat's percentage – never a single flat's time series. Billing data is used for the bill only.

In the console

What a building operator sees

Screenshots from the Cantabile console for a simulated Mieterstrom building in Cologne-Ehrenfeld (November 2026).

The offer to the tenants: price bands for today, tomorrow and the day after, and the period average of 28.32 ct/kWh, 66.2 % of the basic-supply tariff
Simulated dataThe offer: price bands per day and the period average against the basic-supply tariff – exactly what is sent to the tenants' boxes.
Tiles: sold to the tenants 50.8 kWh, into the battery 30.4 kWh, fed in 24.8 kWh, curtailed 0 kWh, shortfall 30.1 kWh, missed margin 8.70 euros
Simulated dataWhere the energy goes over the next 48 hours – including the shortfall bought at a small loss and the margin missed.
Chart over 48 hours: energy sold, battery charging, fed in, wasted and shortfall per quarter-hour
Simulated dataThe same per quarter-hour: the battery charges from the midday sun and covers the evening.
Table of investment variants: plus 5, 10 and 20 kWh of battery with extra sales, gain per year, cost, payback and return
Simulated dataInvest or not: each variant re-solved over the same 48 hours and extrapolated to a year – marked as an estimate.
Simulation

An example from the simulated fleet

A simulated building in Hannover-Linden with seven flats, GGV and a 12 kWh battery; 48 hours in November 2026, with the real 2026 tariffs of the area. The operator chose "15 % below each tenant's own tariff".

56.4 kWhroof power sold in the building in 48 hours
€23.33paid by the tenants – instead of €27.45 at their own tariffs (−15 %)
€19.58earned by the owner: sales €19.61 net, feed-in €0.64, battery wear −€0.66
7.09 ctnet feed-in rate the same roof power would otherwise have earned per kWh
Simulation, and not always a gain.

These are results of the platform's pricing on a simulated building, not a customer's bill. Results depend on sun, season, tariffs and the building. In the same November week a simulated Mieterstrom building in Dresden showed a small loss for the owner (−€1.15 over 48 hours): little sun, and residual power bought dearer than it may be resold under the cap. Cantabile shows such cases plainly instead of pricing them away.

Energy Sharing, §42c

Legal since 2026 – and almost unused

The law is there, but few smart meters, missing processes and full grid fees on every shared kilowatt-hour keep uptake near zero. What it needs is software that handles quarter-hourly allocation, fair prices and members across grid areas – and partners in the energy industry.

Cantabile checks each member against the plant's grid area and its metering, allocates per quarter-hour (pro rata or by fixed shares), prices only the energy part and never above a member's own supplier, and charges the community battery from the plant only.

Our path: with a Stadtwerk

We start with a Stadtwerk or another supplier as partner – as supplier, balancing-group manager and often metering operator – and Cantabile as the platform for sharing, optimisation and the billing items. Cantabile does not become a supplier itself.

For Stadtwerke and suppliers

A building with a solar roof?

Let's look together at what tenant power could mean for your building and your tenants.

Talk to us